WHAT DAVID FINCHER HATH WROUGHT
Willem Dafoe goes up against an art loving serial killer in 'Anamorph'. Struggling artists across the city should take note: Apparently morality is what it takes to succeed in the art business.
By Mark Peikert
Anamorph
Directed by H.S. Miller
Imagine for a moment
what David Fincher's
Seven would have been like had its serial killer
spent more time in college studying art rather than theology, and you'll have
some idea of what to expect from
Anamorph, yet another gruesome
detective movie set in New York City.
After shooting a suspect in the Uncle Eddie serial killings under
suspicious circumstances, Detective Stan Aubray (Willem Dafoe) is briefly
questioned by his superiors, but they let his sloppiness slide since
the killings have stopped. Stan can't let himself off that easily,
though, especially since he neglected to warn a hooker that she might
be a target before Uncle Eddie stabbed her to death. Now, five years
later, what looks like a series of copycat killings start popping up
around town. Tension is expected to arise from the question of whether
or not it's the real Uncle Eddie or just a fan, but
Anamorph is such a
mess from the first frame that it never really matters.
It's shot in such a determinedly 1970s-style, the first time a cell
phone rings it's a jarring experience. Director Miller alternately
takes sloppy shortcuts (we know Stan is messed up because he drinks
airplane bottles of alcohol while driving and doesn't have any friends
other than a former prostitute played by Clea Duvall) and lugubrious
intermissions from the plot for exposition. The most notable—and
laughable—of these is the five-minute art history lesson, complete with
slides, about the concept of anamorphosis, a technique that creates
different images when viewed from different perspectives. This
fascinating sidenote culminates in a heart-pounding scene in which
ambitious young detective Carl (Scott Speedman) makes a
staggering discovery with the help of his conveniently mirrored coffee
mug.
Nor does it help that the serial killer's frenzy of activity after
such a long retirement is attributed to his sudden refusal to wait for
"the moment" of creation. Instead, he's forcing the moment by
constructing elaborate tableaux for each of his victims, apparently
intended for Stan to discover. And in increasingly unlikely
circumstances, that's exactly what he does, from finding a painting of
the first crime in the window of a second-hand store near his apartment
to finding a chair stolen from his apartment in the killer's gallery
show. Yes, a serial killer has taken the time to somehow snag a gallery
show, despite never dealing with the owner in person. Struggling
artists across the city should take note: Amorality is what it takes to
succeed in the art business, apparently.
Even the casting of Dafoe is a lazy way of avoiding character
development. Placing their faith in Dafoe's face, nothing more than
skin tightly stretched over his skull at this point, Miller and
co-screenwriter Tom Phelan leaves Stan an enigma, a hardworking cop
ruined by a brutal serial killer, inexplicably still on the force in
between teaching dull classes. Toss in Duvall's ex-prostitute's weird
habit of giving blood (she's doing so in two out of her three scenes)
and Speedman's confusing cop (is he just ambitious, or ambitious enough
to kill?), and what you get is a grimy, ugly film about death and the
living dead in New York City, without the redeeming ambition of
Seven
or even the cultural commentary of
Summer of Sam.