Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  The Mis-Education of a Millionaire
Wednesday, November 12,2008

The Mis-Education of a Millionaire

Don’t expect the real India: Danny Boyle gives guilty liberals absolution through game-show gimmickry

By Armond White
. . . . . . .

Danny Boyle proved his lack of genuine seriousness with last decade’s hipster-chic Trainspotting where he attempted to turn drug addiction into a lower-depths, rock ’n’ roll carnival. After several box-office flops (including The Beach and Sunshine) and the literally unwatchable horror movie hit 28 Days Later, Boyle is back in frenetic mode. His Slumdog Milllionaire is a stylized, excessively edited rags-to-riches goof about a little boy from the slums of Mumbai (formerly Bombay) who grows up to win 20 million rupees on the TV game show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? 


Uniquely British in its TV-influenced ostentation, Slumdog is directed with attention-deficit compulsiveness like so much product from England’s advertising mills. Jamal’s young life story, conceived as an epic, parallels India’s continuing systemic corruption. Boyle cuts back and forth between Jamal’s ragamuffin childhood, his menial adolescent struggles and his game show adulthood. The constantly interrupted narrative defines the TV program as the source of redemption and triumph. Despite first suggesting that Jamal’s fortunes are the result of a) luck, b) cheating, c) destiny, it’s all a goddamn advert for TV culture. When Jamal asks, “Why does everyone like this program?” He is told, “A chance to escape, isn’t it? Walk into another life.”


Also uniquely British is the film’s blithe condescension about the dehumanizing conditions of the former colony. Slumdog absolves the white man’s burden with game-show flash and shrillness. Boyle’s response to poverty and degradation is to go pop: Dogme videographer Anthony Dod Mantle uses a festive range of colors that gives false vitality to the soul-deadening action. Teeming crowds, hustling con artists, smiley/treacherous child-abusers, ethnic rioters, outhouse jokes, chase scenes and gunplay are used for excitation and shock.

There hasn’t been a social drama this decadently over-hyped since City of God. Boyle plays the same game of pandering to liberal sensibilities while entertaining safe, middle-class distance.


Over-stimulation crushes feeling; Boyle only evokes sentimentality. His cast of child actors is overly cute—for easy sympathy and for automatic horror when they’re shown being mutilated by adults who run a beggar/prostitution underground. This parallels the game-show interval where Jamal is tortured—beaten, waterboarded, hung-up, electrocuted—by the show’s host. A little Gitmo for guilty liberals. Boyle’s patronizing pattern is revealed when survival-minded Jamal swindles white tourists. “You wanted to see a bit of the real India? You’re in it!” he says. And the bleeding hearts respond, “Well here’s a bit of the real America” giving Jamal a hundred-dollar bill—his first taste of unexamined extortion.


That ugly exchange typifies this anti-Darjeeling Limited. Boyle trades exploitation for schmaltz. Buñuel’s slum-kids masterpiece Los Olvidados cut through such crap. Slumdog adorns it with a hip-hop and pop-song soundtrack (including MIA) that agitates Jamal’s world without explaining it—while also parading the deceitfulness of Boyle’s world. Slumdog proves British cinema has a knack for producing TV-slick frauds: Boyle, Michael Winterbottom, Adrian Lyne, Tony and Ridley Scott. Their fancy misrepresentations disgrace Britain’s narrative legacy. Slumdog reminds me that by overlooking the recent David Lean retrospective, our film culture makes itself susceptible to Boyle’s trashy spectacle and contemporary English filmmaking that betrays its moral and artistic connection to Dickens, Kipling and Forster’s understanding of social organization and individual life patterns.


Lurid, chaotic and maudlin, Slumdog suggests a Baz Luhrmann version of Oliver Twist. Dorky Jamal (Dev Patel) survives this scheming world only by winning cash. The irony of his game-show ingenuity should portray Jamal’s abuse and indicate the tragedy of mis-education every Millionaire question triggers, including his horrific recollection of ethnic cleansing and matricide.


But Jamal’s reward is self-centered; he’s reunited in puppy love with Latika (Frieda Pinto), while his dark-skinned childhood friend Salim (Madhur Mittal) becomes the story’s convenient villain and victim. The bloody/corny finale includes a replay of all Jamal’s literally shit-covered memories. Boyle aggressively crosscuts between the three protagonists’ fates, putting D.W. Griffith’s most radical narrative invention to disgraceful use. Boyle is a poverty pimp with an Avid.

--
Slumdog Millionaire
Directed by Danny Boyle, Running Time: 120 min.
--

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 10/19/2009 
 
Interested in the NEW book by Armond White? It's called, "KEEP MOVING: The Michael Jackson Chronicles" and it's a collection of essays on the subject of King Of Pop, MICHAEL JACKSON. Written over the course of 25 years, the essays focus on the songs and music videos AFTER the Thriller album. If you are interested in more information, google the title OR visit the blog www.resistanceworks.blogspot.com

 

Posted at 04/10/2009 
 
It is obvious you have not been paying attention to the movie when you described Salim as Jamal's 'darkskinned childhood freind' . Actually, they are brothers

 

Posted at 02/19/2009 
 
Mr. White is ostensibly afflicted with an inexplicable compulsion to use "maudlin" or "mawkishness" to describe any film that contains even a vestige of sentimentality or emotion. His argument that " teeming crowds, hustling con artists, smiley/treacherous child-abusers, ethnic rioters, outhouse jokes, chase scenes and gunplay are used for excitation and shock" is ultimately a specious one. It is a veritable depiction of Mumbai, and your traducement of the film is rather churlish in that respect.

 

Posted at 01/23/2009 
 
Thank you Armond White for speaking the truth. I went to the cinema earlier tonight to see Slumdog Millionaire. I found it depressing and deeply offensive. There were issues in there which could have been raised. However, it was just another piece of mainstream 'made for a Western audience' movie who can't take to much truth about the human race's greed and the evils of globalisation. I almost expected the audience to buy their fairtrade products out halfway and feel like they'd done something good for the 'Third World' For me it was no different from Billy Elliot dancing his way out of poverty or poor 'old Julia Roberts' being rescued from prostitution by a millionaire. How nice that the audience don't have to go home feeling too bad huh?!. Makes me want to stick one of those National Lottery 'It could be you' stickers on the movie poster. A terrible movie for and by liberals who are as dangerous as facists.

 

Posted at 02/10/2009 
I go to see a movie to be entertained. You on the other hand go to pay penance. I suggest next time you go to see a movie you wear a hairshirt or alternatively watch a Bollywood movie. You self righteous idiot.

 

Posted at 01/16/2009 
 
The movie basically shows how India is a country of uncivilized barbarians which needs to be tamed and civilized by the good, compassionate white folks - just like the American couple who saved Jamal when he was getting beaten and gave him $100 and said "son, this is the real America!". In short, the white man is good and the brown man is bad, even the good ones.

 

Posted at 01/18/2009 
Your comments are bizarre. In the whole film there is a single scene with two white people in it. The Indian guy manages to get $100 out of them without doing too much. Who wins? The Indian guy i.e. the brown man (if you need to put it that way). The film is about poverty - not the kind that we see in the Western world but real, crushing, oppresive poverty. The vast majority of Indians live in poverty - fact. A lot of these guys have to do what they can to survive. By transposing your Western moral framework over the actions of these guys you show a complete disregard of different cultures. Remember these are brown men in a brown man's country - if there is oppression it is brown man on brown man. You can try and blame the white man but it doesn't wash. India is not the USA - however hard you try.

 

 
 


  • Wed
    4
  • Thu
    5
  • Fri
    6
  • Sat
    7
  • Sun
    8
  • Mon
    9
  • Tue
    10

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close