Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  Silent Light (Stellet Licht)
Wednesday, January 7,2009

Silent Light (Stellet Licht)

Carlos Reygadas’ Silent Light is more posing for the poseurs

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
MEXICO’S CRITICALLY OVER- RATED Carlos Reygadas is unlikely to breakthrough to popular acclaim with his latest film, Stellet Licht, while Mexico’s highly publicized “Three Amigos”— Alfonso Cuarón, Alejandro Gonzáles Iñáritu and Guillermo del Toro—are just that: commercial clowns. Between these camps stands Julián Hernández, Mexico’s

finest filmmaker with the greatest human touch—which may be why his masterpieces Broken Sky and A Thousand Clouds of Peace have gone uncelebrated. Humanism is critically unpopular among art snobs.

Art snobs prefer the noncommittal mystification that Reygadas applies to the sex lives of his benighted characters—whether the peasants of Japón, the menials of Battle in Heaven or the community of displaced Mennonites in Stellet Licht who break commandments when family man farmer Johannes “Jaunito”Voth (Cornelio Wall) commits adultery with Marianne (Maria Pankratz) and Esther (Miriam Toews).What could draw American critics and international film festival elites to Reygadas’ deliberately offputting work except for it grandstanding formalism and spiritual skepticism? Stellet Licht (which means “silent light” in the film’s arcane Plautdietsch language of immigrant Russian Mennonites) commits art-fraudulence by remaking themes and images from Carl Theodor Dreyer’s 1953 Ordet—the film about resurrection.

Reygadas’ parody has been praised in nonresponsive terms: for its light and texture— but not meaning. It’s the same reception Days of Heaven got but outside the 1970s context of re-examined American history.

Reygadas flatters critics who bluff past their confusion about Dreyer by latching on to externals as Lars Von Trier once did. Examine Reygadas’ form: Stellet Licht opens with a slow, deliberate night-todawn skyscape, but this is not phenomenology.

It’s so obviously CGI, mixing in mooing cows, howling jackals or sobbing humans on the soundtrack, that it defies one’s sense of nature.Terence Davies did this better in the skyscape of The Long Day Closes, which was an homage to the opening of David Lean’s Oliver Twist. In Reygadas’ inept perfectionism, the earth doesn’t move, nor do the clouds. His flaming landscapes recall the declassé Gone with the Wind as surely as the windy grass lands recall Ordet. If there was a joke in all this solemnity it might resemble Tarantino, but Reygadas is a humorless, unsexy filmmaker which may be why this love triangle lacks the sensuality of Murnau’s Sunrise (another art-film citation).

In Reygadas’ facetious approach to his subject matter, he pushes Art buttons: lots of rewound clocks and that big Dreyeresque moment confronting death. It lacks the wit and feeling of Frank Borzage’s Three Comrades where a thrown watch transcends time and death. Reygadas’ only progress past that is dubious: He features blatant sexual exhibition that violates his actors’ privacy while appealing to naive critics. Stellet Licht doesn’t achieve ecstasy or express belief in it. Reygadas is a poseur for poseurs.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 11/12/2009 
 
As much as I can appreciate your honesty and there is indeed the need for critical reviews, your reaction to the film feel personal rather than objective. I saw the film and even though I did not believe his (Reygadas) involvement with the Mennonites, I was moved by the subtlety of the story and appreciate his attempt at casting light on this rather unknown part of Mexican culture. He probably approached the film as a Mexican, looking at the subject with intrigue and distance. Also, the Mennonites are of German descent not Russian... do your research before you write). Also the reason why Julián Hernández is not well known is because he makes films about gay couples and that is not generally mainstream (sadly enough).

 

Posted at 08/15/2009 
 
There's no accounting for taste, of course, but I'll put in my 2 cents and say that I think that you are dead wrong on this one. Stellet Licht is a wonderful film. To call it a "parody" IS elite snobbishness raised to the n-th level. That is, the omnipotent reviewer knows something that the mere mortals who were touched by the film do not know. And of course Reygadas knows Dreyer and uses effects (as for instance the rain storm when the wife dies of a heart attack). But the great thing is that we don't really care, whereas in lesser films we would care a lot.

 

Posted at 03/09/2009 
 
It never bodes well for a film critic when their review consists primarily of how it isn't "like" or as good as other films. You also seem to be under the impression that Reygadas is trying to sneak allusions past you, which he clearly is not. Of course he is alluding to Bergmann and Dreyer (and others). It seems as though you have deemed him not allowed to allude to anything. What is really funny is that you irrelevantly and fatally write off Cuaron and Innaritu as "clowns" before you even begin to discuss Reygadas' film. You only like the saccharine version of these guys and dismiss every Mexican filmmaker that doesn't suckle its audience. Why do publications release critiques that are so obviously pre-determined? What's the point?

 

Posted at 01/20/2009 
 
blah blah blah. You are the worst movie reviewer in the English speaking world. If somebody takes more than 2 seconds to digest the garbage you write they realise that you write the biggest pile of b*u*l*l*s*h*i*t ever committed to paper. You are a badly educated fraud.

 

 
 


  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26
  • Fri
    27
  • Sat
    28
  • Sun
    29

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close