Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  I Love You, Man
Wednesday, March 18,2009

I Love You, Man

Paul Rudd proves he plays gay better than anyone

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
I Love You, Man
Directed by John Hamburg
Runtime: 110 min.

The sitcom blight continues with the gag-infested I Love You,Man. Instead of credibly accounting for the insecurity and social maladjustment of go-it-alone, friendless men, writer-director John Hamburg contrives a situation where California real estate agent Peter Klaven (Paul Rudd) needs to find a best man for his upcoming marriage to Zooey (Rashida Jones). After a series of “man-dates,” mild-mannered Peter meets gross, boisterous Sydney Fife (Jason Segel), an investor who shows Peter the joys of masculine camaraderie.

If those TV-cute character names don’t turn your stomach, the simplification of genuine emotion will. Hamburg has that Judd Apatow knack of reducing life possibilities to comic shtick. Is it possible that seven decades after radio’s “Fibber McGee and Molly,” and just 10 years after TV’s

Friends, filmmakers and audiences have come to expect manipulative jokes as a summary of human experience? From its snarky title on down, everything about I Love You, Man—Peter’s preference for female friends, taunting from his father, competition with a male co-worker—ignores the complexities of male identity.The bigger issue of friendship—which was the real subject of Fanboys and Adam Sandler’s underrated I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry—is completely misunderstood.

Through sitcom phoniness, Hamburg teases the culture’s unease with homosexuality. An Out magazine puff-piece on the film mentions, “the source of the humor…isn’t in homosexuality itself but in the fraught relationship straight men have with it.”Then why does Hamburg trivialize Peter and Sydney’s attempts at intimacy through love of the rock band Rush? Hamburg’s formulaic humor is a symptom of how our culture denies intimacy.

Laughing at these infantile jokes (Sydney’s bachelor-frankness about masturbation and oral sex) builds resistance to emotional maturity. And for what? To further accustom us to the coarsening of TV-style humor.

Paul Rudd should know better. Rudd’s films with his buddies from The State (Diggers,The Ten, Role Models) explored male identity with daring, recognizable honesty and wit. His Apatow films are like his Neil LaBute work: gross falsification. It’s ironic that Rudd’s sensitive-doofus specialty— which has always leaned toward superb gay delicacy—should be exploited by Hamburg’s crudeness. No actor acts gay better than Paul Rudd, whether imitating Tom Ford’s gay lecher chic for a Vanity Fair cover parody or Peter’s blushing reaction to his own macho outburst. But the scenes contrasting meek Peter with his cockhound gay brother (played by Andy Samberg) are merely a PC suck-up.

Samberg’s role allows Hamburg and Rudd to avoid the gay-identity risk that Adam Sandler braved in Chuck and Larry.The boymisses-boy detour from Hamburg’s countdown-to-wedding-day plot distracts us from Peter Klaven’s inability to forge emotional honesty with anyone. It’s an accidental metaphor for Hollywood’s sit-com dishonesty.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 09/27/2009 
 
Armond White didn't like this movie simply because there were no black people in it. If you don't believe me you should check out his latest Tyler Perry movie review. This is the same critic that blasted the storyline of District 9 for being too much 'Apartheid' driven. The movie was supposed to be a political satire as well as eye-opener for people to realize what is still happening on the continent of Africa, esp. Darfur. What a joke of a critic. Armond White should not only be fired but dismissed from every seat he holds as some sort of "senior" critic. I do agree with Ebert: Armond White is a troll.

 

Posted at 03/19/2009 
 
The 'underrated" I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry??? And you wonder why you are considered the worst critic writing today...

 

Posted at 09/27/2009 
About dell: Has anyone noticed this same guy comment on Rottentomatoes.com? I think 'dell' is Armond White and he is purposefully making errors.

 

Posted at 08/23/2009 
isla, you must be joking? The is the best "bad" review of an utterly terrible film I've read. Mr. White makes the best point about this film: the emotional dishonesty of a relationship with no reason to exist other than Rush. The movie os rife with questionable dynamics, and stands as a curiosity of pop/Hollywood perceptions of human relationships (that, notwithstanding Mr. White, go utterly unquestioned).

 

 
 


  • Sat
    21
  • Sun
    22
  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26
  • Fri
    27

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close