Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  Little Ashes
Wednesday, May 6,2009

Little Ashes

Lorca’s love for Dalí is shown as celebrity mongering with Merchant-Ivory banality

By Armond White
. . . . . . .

Little Ashes
Directed by Paul Morrison
at Chelsea Clearview, Paris & Landmark
Runtime: 112 min.

Little Ashes is

a melodrama about the gay closet focusing on poet Frederico García Lorca’s love for painter Salvador Dalí when both were students just before the Spanish Civil War. As schoolmate Luis Buñuel womanizes in the distance, Lorca and Dalí torment and tease each other due to social and personal repression. Director Paul Morrison and screenwriter Philippa Goslett aren’t stupidly PC like Kirby Dick; instead, being starstruck weakens their love story.

Superficial celebrity-ogling (a form of gossip-mongering) gets in the way of portraying Lorca, Dalí and Buñuel as individuals forging their sexual identities.This pre-fame prism lacks the sense of danger that might explain Lorca’s daring and Dalí’s deviousness as two sides of the same closet crisis. Robert Pattinson braves Dalí’s eccentricity and grows with it. Javier Beltrán makes Lorca more priggish than heroic.The filmmakers sabotage their political sympathies with dull casting.

Their aesthetics are also drab. Imitation surrealist montages—from Lorca and Dalí swimming in azure pools, B&W études in the style of Un Chien Andalou (even pilfering the famous eyeball slashing)—don’t make up for the overall Merchant-Ivory sense of classy banality (youthful dalliance in college linens).

Just recently, John Maybury’s Edge of Love captured the personal folly of pioneering artists and, of course, Alan Rudolph’s Investigating Sex and The Moderns set the bar for films about cultural innovators who move the culture forward despite their messy lives. Little Ashes is named after a Dalí painting inspired by Lorca, but in this rarefied genre, the real masterpiece is Rudolph’s Dorothy Parker bio, Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 05/06/2009 
 
Armond is the best critic around. The only one I read every week. I look foward to his work each and every Wed. Keep at it Armond. He needs to do a book like John Simon did, who also is a great read for anyone who likes a reviewer who can think and not just give his mindless feelings like all the Ebert clones out there.

 

Posted at 05/06/2009 
 
To anyone who reads this comment: Do not return to this website to view this imbecile's reviews. We should stop feeding into his plan of writing ludicrous b.s. to ensure that people will consistently (though angrily) read his columns and he will keep his job. He's like a Omarosa will a keyboard, simply stirring the pot and saying wild sh't so that people will continue to come back and see what horsesh't he's peddling this week. It should end today. The fact that he gave The Wrestler a bad review should be the first clue that this guy doesn't like movies in general and is miserable with his current assignment. If all you see is crap, day in and day out, why not move on to a happier profession. The reason is because he's a miserable turd as well, having missed out on one or two of Daddy's hugs. Enjoy being alone and pissed, A$$hole!

 

Posted at 05/07/2009 
Waste your energy elsewhere. I enjoy reading Armond White. Yes, he is a brat. But he is also thought provoking and well versed in the history of cinema. If you prefer a critic who loves everything that you do, read Peter Travers.

 

 
 


  • Sat
    21
  • Sun
    22
  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26
  • Fri
    27

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close