Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  Get Smart: Away We Go
Wednesday, June 3,2009

Get Smart: Away We Go

Sam Mendes teams with Dave Eggers & Vendela Vida to try to impress indieland

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
Away We Go
Directed by Sam Mendes
Runtime: 98 min.

Likable TV actors Maya Rudolph and John Krasinski stress their charm to the limit in Away We Go. As Verona and Burt, an unmarried, mixed-race couple expecting their first child, Rudolph’s warm coloring and freckly, smiling placidity contrasts Krasinki’s lanky, unfazed, bigboy goofiness.They represent an Obama-era ideal, born of the media’s predominant middle-class tenets: casual affluence, social mobility and the amazing self-possession of...TV stars.

Verona and Burt travel the country, visiting friends and relatives just to figure out how/where they want to live. It’s an indie update of a 1970s road movie; but where American picaresques like Five Easy Pieces, California Split, Rafferty and the Gold Dust Twins, even a trifle like the Goldie Hawn- Burt Reynolds Best of Friends were about self-examination, Away We Go shows the peculiar effect of Internet-era self-involvement: Nicey-nice Verona and Burt reveal how superior they are to every screwed-up American they encounter.

Rudolph and Krasinki may be more appealing than Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy who incarnated almost similar young-andelite vanity in Before Sunrise and Before Sunset; yet Hawke and Delpy felt more real in their infuriating, overeducated narcissism.They had film-actor depth, instead of Rudolph-Krasinski’s deeply superficial TV- Q, and they seemed self-sufficient in their Hoboken/Williamsburg cocoon (aka Paris). Each stop on Verona and Burt’s excursion (Phoenix, Tucson, Madison, Montreal, Miami) offers glib social critique—and then none: They arrive at a place of luxurious privilege that is their unquestioned bourgeois legacy. Never showcasing different time-zones or political lifestyles, as in David O. Russell’s road film Flirting With Disaster, this solipsistic tour recoils from instances of troubled intimacy and unfulfilled parenthood. Mild-mannered Verona eventually asks the key navel-gazer, “Are we nuts? Are we fucked up?” It’s judgment of others via blogger sensibility.

Away We Go was written by McSweeney’s/The Believer duo Dave Eggers and his wife Vendela Vida. Too bad they’re not TV buffs as the title, recalling Jackie Gleason’s motto, suggests. But Eggers and Vida don’t reference Gleason’s The Honeymooners, one of TV’s perfect sitcoms with its classically tense/loving portrait of marriage.They’re post-marriage, yet try reinventing that same wheel on which their friends and relatives spin. It’s a pointlessly self-satisfying effort and wanly narcissistic—which makes it less fresh than Hawke and Delpy’s egotism. Eggers and Vida seem unaware that their quandary is ageold and has become formulaic, despite tossing in snarky class ironies (Verona earns a living drawing medical casualty illustrations, Burt fakes macho bonhomie with his insurance clients).

Irony has become a blight on filmmaking, particularly for this period of blurred indie-mainstream methods. Uncritical audiences—who feel either superior or susceptible—can’t distinguish between condescension and flattery.That’s where slick director Sam Mendes comes in. Mendes takes Eggers’ and Vida’s neo-sitcom script and gives it his usual cynical gloss of Irony.Verona’s smarter-than-thou, “Are we fucked-up?” follows right behind Mendes’ mendacious Revolutionary Road—failed Oscar bait that used the cliché of 1950s suburban marriage to appeal to contemporary American self-hatred. Scene by scene, Away We Go is equally phony: from a xenophobe declaring, “If this country’s shit, everyone else is just the flies on our shit,” to cameo appearances by Catherine O’Hara, Alison Janney, Paul Schneider and Carmen Ejogo that are horrendously overwrought in Mendes’ American Beauty mode.

After several expensive box-office disasters, Mendes has yet to renew himself in indieland. Away We Go is as calculated as any summer tentpole blockbuster. Mendes sets out to prove: “I can do a Juno, too!” Dialogue is so over-bright it could have been written by Diablo Cody (“He’s about to have a baby that might have three hands or a shovel for a head, and all he can think about is my boobs.”). Compositions are cunning and unrealistic, like Verona and Burt staying mid-distance on an airport people-mover or Burt lying on a trampoline near a swimming pool in the backyard of a pink house. Plus, the twee guitarplucking score nags at your emotions.

All this reflects the influence of indie crap like Juno, Lars and the Real Girl,The Savages—movies designed to make audiences feel smart.Verona’s specious childhood monologue about hanging oranges and pineapples from trees is part of this, and so is her “Mr.Tambourine Man” lullaby. We’re given Dylanolatry where a lullaby from The Pixies,The Smiths, Nirvana or De La Soul would convey a genuine modern quest for relief.Verona’s lapse back into the security of her boomer parents’ nostalgia shows Eggers solicits an NPR audience and standard class sentiments. British Mendes seems inured to such cultural distinctions as he continues his career of specious American exposés.Whether Mendes flatters American cynicism or sentimentality, it’s equally fake.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 06/20/2009 
 
Great review! Although you went a little easy on the twee folkie crap. I wanted to kick the hipster beard guy and the whiny singer (note: also bearded) in the balls by the end of the trailer.

 

Posted at 06/10/2009 
 
ADD
"reveal how superior they are to every screwed-up American they encounter." This is an interesting statement coming from a reviewer who reviles America for its love of Pixar (Brad Bird movies aside, of course) and its unquenched (and probably unquenchable) thirst for simple-minded nostalgia. What you find in art is what you find in yourself. This makes the critic's job a strange one, as what a critic doesn't like about a film is probably a projection of what he doesn't like about himself. To that end, your statement quoted at the top of this comment makes sense, given your other reviews, Mr. White. I suspect that people are increasingly without moorings because religion and "traditional" values have refused to address themselves in a meaningful way to the economy and technology of our world. The result is a deep emotional need to find security in childhood . . . nostalgia . . . comfort food for the soul. Like a lot of comfort food, a regular diet of it will make a body sick. But the need to feel some level of certainty and comfort is undeniable. And it is undeniably a large part of the modern American cultural anxiety. And there's the problem that your writings reveal, Mr. White. In an age when we have no choice but to look cynically on the myths of our childhood - to a large extent because an adult sensibility cannot help but see them as childish caricatures of themselves - we also long for the days when the innocence of our childhood allowed us to feel nurtured within these myths. We are at the point of trying to return to childhood - and there's no such thing because the best you'll get is a fragile and short-lived delusion. The world isn't this-or-that like it was in old war movies where nobody asked what the difference was between "us" and "them" but merely accepted it as a given that "us" was morally superior to "them." You seem to long for a return to such cleaner, simpler times when the world was indeed regarded by adult minds in black-and-white terms. And the resistance you are getting leads you to feel the need to reveal how superior you are to every screwed-up American you encounter.

 

Posted at 07/20/2009 
All times long for childhood and all times glorify the past. Mr. White, as you like to call him, analyzes the present. If he were a critic in another time, he would do the same. Your comment is extremely well-written but it is lost in the wrong plot.

 

Posted at 06/04/2009 
 
It's a pretty smug and awful movie. This review is great, though. Nice one Mr. White!

 

Posted at 06/04/2009 
 
Again, not a movie I'm remotely interested in, but as an essay on the shit we're force-fed ("it's good for you, I swear!"), I couldn't agree more. I loved "American Beauty" so much the first time that I bought the video. And I've never been able to watch it to the end again. It is so damn contrived.

 

 
 


  • Sat
    7
  • Sun
    8
  • Mon
    9
  • Tue
    10
  • Wed
    11
  • Thu
    12
  • Fri
    13

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close