Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Tuesday, August 11,2009

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Directed by Stephen Sommers
Runtime: 118 min.

In his perceptive, unillusioned review of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, critic Edward Douglas cites how the movie “really gets to the appeal of G.I. Joe’s fanbase, although far too often, the movie veers into territory that seems more like advertising for the cool vehicles and playsets.” Because it’s the summer—hell, the era—of capitalist domination where junk movies win front page newspaper headlines and tie-in commercial products become “news” stories as well as Happy Meals, G.I. Joe must be understood as an authentic measurement of our cultural values. Its unabashed appeal to the pop-commercial synapses also demonstrates livelier filmmaking than such utter banality as Iron Man and Star Trek and Harry Potter’s Half-Blooded Chintz.

With G.I. Joe, we don’t have to put on that we’re above trash—after all, it’s based on a Hasbro toy and a popular animated TV series for kids. Channing Tatum as Duke, the archetypal All-American soldier and Marlon Wayans as Ripcord, his soul-brother sidekick, fight biological-weapons untrustworthies (Christopher Eccleston and Sienna Miller, whose British accents add to their villainy) with the assist of military elites General Hawk (Dennis Quaid), Scarlett (Rachel Nichols) and Snake Eyes (Ray Park). Sommers creates a big-screen version of “Let’s Pretend” which means his knack—inoffensively displayed in The Mummy—hits the Jackpot.

The Jackpot (cashing in on the thrill-seeking curiosity of generations raised on popcorn and plastic) is a reality that today’s politically unconscious movie critics try to disavow when dismissing this brand of entertainment. With inconsistent and arbitrary affectation, they demean defensible movies like Transformers 2 and G.I. Joe as if to deny that what used to be called “mass culture” has, generally, lost its former standards.

It’s a self-protective reflex by which they’ll praise undistinguished junk like Wanted, 3:10 to Yuma and Drag Me to Hell to defend Hollywood’s routine, commercial U.S.S. Enterprises. The fun part of G.I. Joe grasps its own junkiness. None of its stunts are especially witty—and real distinctions must be made for Transporter 3 and Torque's superior pop art—but G.I. Joe’s in the same innocuous class as the Laura Croft and Thunderbirds movies. It has the spirit of Saturday Afternoon toy commercials, even to the extent of extolling basic American values: the very realistic appreciation of militarism as a foundation for capitalist freedom that supplies delight in both G.I. Joe and Transformers 2. There’s more realpolitik here than in the now-overrated The Hurt Locker.

As for acting, operatives Tatum and Wayans look great in their special Accelerator suits, surging through the air, tumbling and weaving in dreamlike acrobatics to gladden the wide-eyed part of your aesthetic sensibility. Like race cars approaching Mach speed, they dodge missile plumes, then zoom toward the soon-to-be-legendary Eiffel Tower sequence. Maybe it’s revenge for Franco-snobbery after 9/11. Perhaps it’s also decadent exercise of CGI license (carrying an inherent warning about technological excess), but like the aircraft carrier and Great Pyramid sequences of Transformers 2: Wow.

Sommers isn’t quite in Michael Bay’s directorial class, but he has the ability to envision a nightmare and spin it into a provocative coup the Surrealists wouldn’t dare. Propriety was already breached in the post-9/11 exploitation of United 93 and the dull cynicism of Cloverfield’s decapitated Statue of Liberty. Sommers’ Eiffel Tower sequence ranks with Tim Burton zapping the Washington Monument into a deadly pendulum in Mars Attacks. Sommers’ outrageous spectacle is what kids cheer as “sick”—the worst spectacle of their gleeful, sandbox-era imaginations.

This Eiffel Tower image also recalls the postmodern epigraph that closes Godard’s In Praise of Love : “I will go to my grave with more visions than man has previously ever known.” The trashy secret of G.I. Joe is its ironic capitalizing on the fact that awesome, dread-filled visions don’t necessarily destroy childhood innocence. Seeing the Eiffel Tower fall is part of loving it (which could not be said of the World Trade Center). The Brothers Grimm understood. That’s why people are queuing-up, contributing to the Jackpot.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 09/06/2009 
 
I need to ask - thought sadly I will never get an answer - what exactly makes you think you're superior to all other film critics (and not only)? I was getting ready to watch District 9 when I came across your review, and I can genuinely say it spoiled the movie for me. But in the spirit of not leaving empty handed, I read some more of your reviews, and I was left with the impression of snobbery and deliberate disagreement with...anyone else really. Sure, I can appreciate your arguments - for you are a smart and (I assume) educated man, but I still feel you're opposing merely for the thrill of being the one different voice. You're accusing Nora Ephron (whom I quite dislike myself) of making Julie & Julia a snob-fest, and yet, is this not what you do with every article?

 

Posted at 09/03/2009 
 
"now-overrated The Hurt Locker?" if I'm not mistaken, didn't you say that the hurt locker was basically one of the three greatest war films ever made? Do you not like it now that you've realized that for once you're in sync with the critical consensus?

 

Posted at 08/30/2009 
 
I knew Armond White would like this film because everybody else hates it. This confirms his TROLL STATUS that he will review a film the opposite of what everybody else thinks simply to get attention. I bet he doesn't even bother to watch the movies he's reviewing

 

Posted at 08/25/2009 
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH **takes a breath** HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA - The walking self-parody strikes again!!

 

Posted at 08/20/2009 
 
BTW I think the following article should be mandatory reading for anyone that appreciates film criticism as a legitimate form of writing: http://nypress.com/article-18219-what-we-dont-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-movies.html

 

 
 


  • Sat
    21
  • Sun
    22
  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26
  • Fri
    27

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close