Home » Articles » 24/7 » 24/7 Theater »  Light Those Torches
Wednesday, October 14,2009

Light Those Torches

‘The Diary of Anne Frankenstein’ plumbs the depths of mediocrity

By Mark Peikert
. . . . . . .

 

CHALK IT UP to another instance of a fabulous title coming before the idea for a show, because the funniest thing about The Diary of Anne Frankenstein is its name. Another in a long line of attempts at reviving the anarchic spirit of Charles Ludlam and other celebrated Downtown theater artists, Anne Frankenstein only succeeds in killing and hour and a half in the most excruciating way imaginable.

 

Drag queen Mimi Imfurst stars as the titular character, proving once again that her ever-increasing fame in the NYC drag scene is inexplicable. Lacking any comic timing or discernible personality, she flounces and bounces heavily around the stage as the hermaphroditic failure of the first attempt by Dr. Frankenstein (Joseph Beuerlein) at creating life. Hidden in an attic, she whiles away the time with her diary (Lavinia Co-op) before Hollywood star Sylvia Beasley (Jessica Caplan) and her husband Paul Perrit (Eric Jaeger) arrive at Frankenstein’s secluded castle. As luck— and terrible writing—would have it, Paul’s body happens to be the perfect fit for the disembodied head of Adolf Hitler (Ryan Feyk) that Frankenstein has salvaged.

Cleverly lacking an intermission to prevent the mass walkouts that would certainly ensue once the audience figures out that playwright Ilya Sapiroe and director Elizabeth Elkins have no idea what they’re doing, Anne Frankenstein galumphs along with all of the panache and style of the living dead. Even side-by-side with Imfurst’s tone-deaf performance (did I mention the infrequent and unwelcome musical num bers?),

Caplan manages to outdo everyone else in being aggressively unfunny. Even the girl sitting a few seats down from me, who gasped every time a gun was pulled on stage, didn’t emit one solitary chuckle at Caplan’s over-the-top, loud, grating performance.

Only Co-op, Feyk and Jaeger have any inkling of the arch, high camp tone that the play so desperately needs. Feyk scored the evening’s biggest laughs with his quick thinking when Caplan couldn’t cover his head correctly with a sheet, which says something about Sapiroe’s jokes. At least Beuerlein and Geoffrey Borman, as Frankenstein’s nephew Fritz, aren’t actively annoying; there’s just not very much either of them—made up to resemble ghouls—can do other than deliver their lines and try not to embarrass themselves.

Though it may seem the height of insanity to even think of complaining about inaccuracies in a show this convoluted and messy, I must add that I didn’t much care for Sunset Boulevard references in a play set 1945 Germany, nor were TV or Marilyn Monroe jokes much appreciated. If Sapiroe was aiming for a spoof of Universal horror films commingled with a healthy poke at Anne Frank and her blasted diary (and if she wasn’t, I shudder at what her real intentions were), she would have done far better to watch Young Frankenstein.At least Mel Brooks’ film gives the impression that he’s actually seen what he’s spoofing.

Along with the gags that land with a thud and the teeth-grinding performances, light and sound cues were consistently dropped, and no one involved with the technical production thought to come up with a solution to Sapiroe’s numerous scene changes, leaving the audience sitting in the dark for an interminable amount of time to rearrange the set every 10 minutes. Sitting there, in the dark, we were given ample time to contemplate what brought us so low as to spend a Saturday night with this dreary bunch of theater professionals—and why none of us thought to bring the kerosene and torches that so many of the people involved in The Diary of Anne Frankenstein so richly deserve.

> The Diary of Anne Frankenstein

Through Nov. 8, 13th Street Repertory, 50 W. 13th St. (betw. 5th & 6th Aves.), 212-352-3101; times vary, $22.50.


  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 10/15/2009 
 
I would have to disagree with this review on almost all fronts. I found the performances of both Beuerlein and Borman much better than passable. Down right hilarious, in fact. As for the skewering Mr. Peikert gives to Caplan, I was under the impression she was to be imitating a 1940s Hollywood actress. Over-the-top, loud, grating... Sounds about right from the films I've seen. I don't completely disagree with his review of Imfurst's performance, but when you need a good Franken-queen, who you gonna call? I did notice some lighting and sound miscues, but given the obviously low budget, I gave them a pass. All in all, a terribly unbalanced review of a show that I found quite entertaining, campy and funny.

 

Posted at 10/15/2009 
 
I thought this show was very funny and very well done given it's obvious budget restrictions. The audience I saw it with seemed extremely involved and supportive.

 

Posted at 10/14/2009 
 
What a hateful and pathetic review by a clearly hateful and insecure individual. Firstly, Miss Imfurst has more talent tucked away in her rectum than you'll ever have, Mark Peikert. And your clear contempt for the world shows that you understand that very clearly.

 

Posted at 10/14/2009 
 
I haven't seen this yet but given the level of intensity of Mr. Peikert, and also given the very favorable reviews I've read and heard from others, I would guess that someone on the production team of Diary did something very bad to Mr. Peikert on a personal level. Then again I can't rightly recall Mr. Peikert having a nice thing to say about anything that I've read him "critique". Also, I don't know what context this play uses them in but television and Marilyn Monroe certainly did exist in the 40's (Monroe signed her first picture deal in '46 -- I just googled it), so maybe Mr. Bitterness should do some research before embarrassing himself any further.

 

Posted at 10/23/2009 
I saw this play last night after reading all the fuss on here... and i was very much surprised. The play is actually VERY funny. Is it shakespeare? No. But its a great offering compared to the usual crap one sees at the off-off-broadway level. You can tell that the author is a new writer and given that, he succeeds where many others have failed. The show is full of some of the most tasteless and hysterical jokes I have seen on stage in a while. The cast is all top notch- and each of them give stellar performances. In regards to the comment about ms monroe. The joke in the show references marilyn as a a young nobody at a pool party being thrown by Ronald Reagan, and that she'll never amount to anything. Seeing as the play takes place years before she's a huge star, the joke is funny. Innacurate? Certainly not. Maybe if Mister Pierkert actually listened to the joke, instead of picking the buttplug out of his ass, he would have got it. And incase you didn't do a little research- TV was very much around in 1945! Candid Camera was definietly around in the 1940s- so maybe one should do a little research before picking on those things. I chalk this one up to another crappy review by a pretentious faggy theatre queen who is too busy sipping cocktails at barrage and jerking off on adam4adam to have any real sense of what's enjoyable to most people.

 

Posted at 10/19/2009 
Tschillinger...he didn't say TV and Marilyn Monroe didn't exist in the 40s, he said jokes about them wouldn't have been appreciated. And Marilyn Monroe was uncredited in her 40s work. Who'd reference an uncredited contract player?

 

 
 


  • Fri
    20
  • Sat
    21
  • Sun
    22
  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close