Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  The Blind Side
Tuesday, November 17,2009

The Blind Side

With all the Preciousmania going around, is Sandra Bullock the only sane one?

By Armond White
. . . . . . .

 

The Blind Side
Directed by John Lee Hancock
Runtime: 126 min.

Sandra Bullock brings sanity to the madness currently infecting the movie scene. Her intelligent, affecting new movie The Blind Side uses a double metaphor (alluding to both a football player’s vulnerability and racial color blindness) to dramatize how people can overcome race and class barriers to achieve their fuller humanity. Bullock’s film is upfront about the attitudes mangled and suppressed in media hype for Precious. The past week’s Preciousmania featured outrageous displays of self-righteousness, fake compassion and gullibility—from white journalists wondering if their instant recoil from the gross figure of Precious was proof of prejudice to a black journalist proposing “There’s a Precious inside all of us.”

Bullock’s movie, about an upper-middle-class white Southern family who take in a homeless black kid, Michael Oher, and paves the path for his future in pro-sports, is so free of the guilt Precious arouses that it simultaneously raises the level of social imagination. Producing and starring in a script by director John Lee Hancock (The Rookie), Bullock trusts that the popular audience shares basic humane values rather than a taste for the squalid and bizarre behavior that defines Lee Daniels’ decadent specialty that has degraded recent cultural discourse.

Every aspect of The Blind Side rectifies the corruption represented by Precious. Based on the book-length account of the NCAA’s recruitment of Oher, it is a true story of how the aimless black Memphis teenager (Quinton Aaron) gets enrolled at a Christian school and then is cared for by the family of Leigh Anne Tuohy (Bullock). But Precious is all fabrication—the most outrageous literary hoax since J.T. Leroy, yet with more mileage since it’s full of the grotesque black myths that the Obama-era media wants to congratulate itself it has remedied. As a counterpoint, The Blind Side—with its Southern Christian Republican setting—enriches Hollywood’s inspirational and sports movie conventions, especially those simplistic nightmares about the ghetto and bromides about the welfare state.

This also reverses conventional movie messages: The Blind Side emphasizes how much the Tuohys’ learn about their privilege; Oher inspires their noblesse oblige—an American pop alternative to bourgeois self-critique as best dramatized in Renoir’s Boudu Saved From Drowning. When Leigh Anne and her husband Sean (Tim McGraw) force the Wingate School to teach Oher and prove its “Neighborly Academic Christian” credo (“We either take that seriously or paint over it,” Sean says), the Tuohy household becomes a laboratory of democracy, sympathy and common—small “l”—liberalism. Unlike Precious, this film doesn’t pretend to be about uplift; it expands into an unquestionably optimistic view of our private and social potential. (As a healthy post-Hurricane Katrina story, this could also be called Americans Saved From Drowning.)

Through the use of basic sports analogy, integration and compassion affects white folks as much as blacks whereas Precious offered one-sided pathos. (Note: Michael’s effect on the Tuohys’ unorthodox Thanksgiving dinner habits.) Leigh Anne begins this transformation tale explaining the position of the Left Tackle as revolutionized after the 1985 pro game where Lawrence Taylor sacked Quarterback Joe Theismann. The conflict inherent in athletic rivalry sublimates racial difference and institutionalized rivalry into a less-anxious form of competition: not race, class and gender as horrorshow but as sportsmanship. All the obvious
fearfulisms are implied yet not emphasized (Leigh Anne tells a denigrating yahoo to “zip it.” Sean notes Michael’s desire for a pickup truck: “He thinks he’s a redneck”).

Although Oher looks like a male Precious (he’s a sullen, hulking behemoth), Aaron doesn’t play the role for our pity. Hancock dares an instructive cultural analogy when Leigh Anne asks Michael if his mother ever read Ferdinand the Bull to him. Another perfectly humanizing metaphor, this opens our view of Michael: We see the man who’ll emerge from the child—his spiritual essence rather than his social type.

Leigh Anne is The Blind Side’s most remarkable social type. At first she recalls the gutsy white girls Goldie Hawn played in Wildcats and Meg Ryan in Across the Ropes, demonstrating comic sass and social smarts some call effortless. But look how wonderfully poised Bullock is playing a WASP Republican Southern diva (and with a disarming lilt in her voice). Bullock’s likeability has been an unsung virtue of American movies for the past decade. It’s key to the enjoyment of movies that could be better (Crash, While You Were Sleeping, The Lake House) and movies that are superb, such as Infamous (the good Truman Capote biopic), The Thing Called Love and now The Blind Side. All Bullock’s films promote an edifying sense of human experience—she has an instinct for what people like to see—and that gift makes The Blind Side the perfect, God-sent antidote to Precious.

Bullock never lets you see her sweat and in this tearjerker, she shrewdly never lets you see Leigh Anne Tuohy cry. She never cheapens compassion. Maybe the only questionable moment is that her retort to a gang of ghetto thugs needed a flash of the iron she threatens—but that would have turned this lovely film into hypocritical sensationalism like Eastwood’s poorly judged social treatise Gran Torino. This is better. Bullock’s discretion is a form of decency.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 12/12/2009 
 
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/banarmondwhite

 

Posted at 11/24/2009 
 
I could not agree more with Armond"s review! This film was amazing good work! The comment that this is "cute and cuddly" racism is just ridiculous! We cannot just brush our ills under the carpet and then claim it is "racism". Michael's s story is TRUE and the film is a wonderful slice of Life unlike that piece of dirt "Precious". Nowhere does the film "posit that the only hope is a Southern White family". Rather this is ONE MAN and ONE FAMILY's story. Would the commenter impostering this board as "Armond" rather that the Tuohy's had NOT helped Michael? The Soloist is also a TRUE STORY! Are we gonna yell racism every time someone crosses the color line to help someone out??? When people do the right thing for someone in need we really need to take this silly obsession with race out of the discussion! And the film does not "push you to feel something" either. Again, this is a TRUE STORY! Gran Torino is fiction! www.thatgirlattheparty.com

 

Posted at 11/21/2009 
 
Offensively wrong. Precious is ridiculous, but this film is cute and cuddly racism and, what's more offensive, Armond knows it. Blind Side posits the only hope for an obese flunky's success, threatened at the start by a crack-smoking, gun-brandishing ghetto family and in the end by an uppity NCAA over-achiever (how's that for a post-Obama black America, Armond?), is an upper-class Southern white family and its (White conveniently leaves this out) KFC-married matriarch!! It's the Right's response to the Left's equally insensitive, The Soloist. Feel free to plug in the aforementioned Blind stereotypes into Armond's critique of a film that 'isn't about an L.A. Times writer who befriends a homeless schizophrenic; it’s [a film] about the middle class feeling better about itself.'

 

Posted at 11/30/2009 
Read the front page of yesterday's LA Times than you'll see the real life Precious.

 

 
 


  • Tue
    9
  • Wed
    10
  • Thu
    11
  • Fri
    12
  • Sat
    13
  • Sun
    14
  • Mon
    15

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter







 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close