Click to Print
Wednesday, June 17,2009

Woody's Wet Dream

Larry David tries to parlay his HBO shtick to the big screen

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
Whatever Works
Directed by Woody Allen
Runtime: 92 min.

Ten years after his great expectoration of bile in Deconstructing Harry, Woody Allen comes up with Whatever Works—the most shameless, cynically titled Hollywood con job since the days of Billy Wilder. Having lost his originality, Allen here reboots the acerbic Deconstructing Harry by mixing in the rancid, misogynistic Mighty Aphrodite. It’s another of his old-goat/young girl fantasies, but with TV’s Larry David in the know-it-all lecher role and Evan Rachel Wood as the bimbo sexpot. Only this time, Allen’s wet dream is primarily bile, adding little wit and then an avalanche of sentimentality.

At first it seems Allen is satirizing his own arrogance when David, playing Boris, a Columbia University professor who teaches “string theory,” protests his superiority to the world—including his other middle-aged bohemian Leftist friends. Allen became good at deflating his admirers—especially in Deconstructing Harry—but then he started catering to them in his decadent European fare, starting with Everyone Says I Love You. Now that contempt seems to include the audience—whom Boris even addresses in one of those inept meta-stunts copied from Bob Hope movies that Allen’s The Purple Rose of Cairo boosters mistook for surrealism.

Whatever Works’ vaudevillian gambit isn’t surreal; it’s insolent.The distinction comes from Boris’ crotchetiness: Only he knows the world is falling apart, that pollution, stupidity and hypocrisy are everywhere. He proudly opposes the “fallacious notion that people are fundamentally decent.”

Boris’ boiled-down philosophy is “Zilch— nothing comes to anything.”This would seem to put Allen in the Todd Haynes, Gus Van Sant nihilistic mode (he employs Milk cinematographer Harris Savides for that artsy, deadened look, negating every room’s light source.) Boris is an old-fashioned prickly egotist like a Saul Bellow misanthrope—which helps connect this character to the one Larry David invented for his HBO series Curb Your Enthusiasm. Allen must envy the urban archetype David originated. It developed from a nervy collision of Jewish intellectual hubris and stand-up comedy chutzpah. David’s personalized angst was candidly self-deprecating yet, through Allen’s ego, Boris flaunts superciliousness. He has the same pompous cultural taste that Allen sponsors in films from Annie Hall to Hannah and Her Sisters.When Boris takes in the homeless Southern girl Melodie St. Ann Celestine (Wood), he berates her pop music as “eardrum-bursting bilge.” It’s the 2009 version of the cultural arrogance Alvy Singer used to woo/intimidate unconfident Annie Hall.

Unattractive as all this is, it’s long been part of Allen’s woo/intimidation of the mainstream. Praising Allen’s films is a way media folk disguise intellectual inferiority: you must enjoy his antagonism—as when Boris calls Melodie a “bedraggled microbe, a sub-mental baton twirler” or uses his pacification through Fred Astaire and Groucho Marx as a weapon of cultural authority. Allen’s arrogance is no longer entertaining. Deconstructing Harry already took it to the limit; that was his real Saul Bellow movie—an obvious response to the boomeranging honesty of assholism seen on TV’s Seinfeld (co-created with Larry David).

It gets worse with Allen’s humorless liberal points against Bible Belt Christianity: Melodie’s mother (Patricia Clarkson) comes looking for her daughter and falls for the lure of the Big City, then her cheating husband (Ed Begley Jr.) comes to town and falls for the lure of alternative lifestyles. It’s a Hello, Dolly! subplot with Boris as a sex-fixated matchmaker—Hello, Dildo!

“I’m a sensitive soul with an enormous grasp of the human condition,” Boris says. “I’m the only one that sees the whole picture, that’s why they call me a genius.” But Woody Allen means it.

This might have half-worked if Larry David was an actor, rather than a performer parlaying his HBO shtick (answering the call of the master distorts David’s once-bracing skepticism). David cannot convey the affection that should come with Boris’ romantic change of heart. And striking as Wood has been in movies like Pretty Persuasion, her sweet young thing doesn’t get a chance to challenge the old goat as Diane Keaton memorably did in Manhattan.Wood becomes another of Allen’s female victims like Judy Davis, Mia Farrow, Mira Sorvino, Scarlett Johansson and Penelope Cruz. If Allen wasn’t a filmmaker, these persistently demeaning female characterizations would stamp him a serial mauler.

Jerry Seinfeld’s canard that his celebrated series was about “nothing” was only taken seriously by people who want to ignore the assholism that was parodied. Allen, who could never repent his own condescension, misappropriates David and Seinfield’s candor. Now he preaches at the morons Deconstructing Harry simply excoriated. Instead of exposing liberal hypocrisy, Allen turns sanctimonious: The embittered Boris, who derided his friends’ “predictable unsatisfying love lives,” gets mushy. Resolving Boris’ anger issues with a homily about life as “a temporary measure of grace” proves that what Allen learned from Larry David and Seinfeld is exactly nothing.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 06/23/2009 
 
Uh ... MC Reiss, can you please point to me the "anti-Semitism" in this review. Or is this just a form of Sharptonism where you accuse those of being a bigot simply for being critical of someone who's a member of a historically-oppressed minority group?

 

Posted at 06/22/2009 
 
NY press seems to like the controversy generated by Armond White's hateful, bile-filled reviews. You need to lay off the negativity, NY Press and Armond White, because I, for one, read the paper less and not more when I find it filled with pointless insults, epithets, anti-semitism (Armond...), and the like. Armond White is still the best example in New York of someone embittered by an empty and forgettable legacy, a failed career as an artist, and someone who therefore takes potshots at the champions. Woody is a true super-filmmaker, a champion of the humanity in all of us, and an avatar of our conflicted existence. Armond is too proud to be deferent or respectful, so finds his career and his justification and his paycheck in trying to take out the good guys, when he should be taking aim at more immediate threats to whatever remains of our dignity in this hostile game of pecking orders, monkey barrels, and circle jerks. Why can't you guys at NY Press hire someone who celebrates the good left in the world and the potential for change, harmony, and honesty. See, Armond, this is why other critics like Aaron Hillis and J. Hoberman get all the good interviews and why you're languishing in the tarpits of hate-mail and grade-school level vitriole.

 

Posted at 06/20/2009 
 
The sunshine here. Here is the sunshine, with delicate rays and the sound of a light breeze: and this is my care, when everything shines and the night fades away. Francesco Sinibaldi

 

Posted at 06/19/2009 
 
There is nothing more to Billy Wilder's films than their cynical nature that border on morbidity. They are trash that have absolutely no redeeming qualities about them. You couldn't have mentioned better examples than The Apartment and Sunset Boulevard, but don't forget, the horrendous Some Like It Hot, which is the eiptome of Wilder cynicism. To have a soul as pure as Marilyn Monroe in the cynical garbage proves to you what kind of man he was. I would like to borrow a quote from White that was used on Baumbach which is "You can look at his movies and you can tell he's an a__hole." That should be Wilder's epitaph.

 

Posted at 06/19/2009 
 
How does this guy have a job? Is he bashing Woody, Larry, Seinfeld, and BILLY WILDER in the same "article"? Didn't Cruz just win an oscar playing one of Woody's "Victims"?... Actually most of the women mentioned won the same award... Woody is not the one with issues, Armond... I believe you are - Did he not sign an autograph for you when you were a kid? Did he sleep with you wife... or daughter? Please, next time - leave your pseudo-intellectual attitude at the door and review the film or go see 17 Again... that may be more your pace.

 

Posted at 10/17/2009 
If you read the article properly, you will see that he is not bashing Jerry Seinfeld and Larry David.

 

Posted at 06/24/2009 
I seriously hope this posting was a joke... Perhaps, try removing your head from your a$$ and watch Wilder's films again, hopefully you will be able to see them a little more clearly. Oh, and next time, try to not use the same word 3 times in a post. We get it, you think Billy is cynical.

 

 
 
Close
Close