Click to Print
Wednesday, June 17,2009

The Disposal of Commitment

Both 'The Proposal' and 'The Hangover' are coarse humor

By Armond White
. . . . . . .

 

The Proposal
Directed by Anne Fletcher
Runtime: 107 min.

The Hangover

Directed by Todd Phillips
Runtime: 100 min.

The U.S. premiere of Alain Cavalier’s 1962 Le Combat dans L’ile at Film Forum (screening through June 18) resurrects the captivating images of Romy Schneider and Jean-Louis Trintignant, both young, vibrant and emotionally complex in ways actors rarely are anymore.Their classic glamour came back to mind while I watched The Proposal and The Hangover—contemporary movies that use actors in ways that disrespect the audience’s need for big- screen identification.

Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds as The Proposal’s battling white-collar workers who fall in love contrast Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis and Justin Bartha as the bachelor party gang in The Hangover.

Good looks and genuine charm are the basis of Bullock and Reynolds’ appeal; their skillful comic nuance creates an implicit trust.

But in The Hangover, something different occurs: rising-star Bradley Cooper and gang represent the dirtbag element that has become acceptable in contemporary comedy.

Cooper isn’t immediately likable; he’s got shifty-eyed good looks that passed for WASP arrogance in his breakthrough supporting role in Wedding Crashers. It recalls what Jack Nicholson brought to the mainstream. But where Nicholson’s early star roles were meant to be countercultural, Cooper now embodies today’s impish standard.

Yet both The Proposal and The Hangover are coarse farces that stretch their performers’ capacities for human rapport past credibility into base, desperate plot mechanisms. Every scene between Bullock and Reynolds only suggests how fine they might be in good circumstances, while Cooper’s posse increasingly misbehaves as if confirming a general hopelessness about society and adulthood. Bullock’s Margaret, a New York book editor, bribes her male secretary, Andrew (Reynolds), into marriage to protect her illegal alien status. Cooper’s crew uses a friend’s Las Vegas bachelor party to avail themselves of unlimited masculine prerogative—meaning drugs, drinking, sex, violence, bestiality and blackmail. Marriage is the implicit casualty of both movies—a plot development that looks especially odd next to the Cavalier film where Schneider,Trintignant and Henri Serre (from Jules and Jim) ponder the ethics of marriage and politics.


Anne Fletcher, director of The Proposal, and Todd Phillips, director of The Hangover, do the opposite.They merely shoot their scripts without much feeling for interpersonal commitment among couples or friends. No doubt this derives from the insistent immaturity established by Judd Apatow’s juvenile comedy. Remember how The New Yorker tried connecting Knocked Up to the sophistication of 1930s screwball? It proved that this new movement merely flattered the privileged egotism of our culture’s ruling class. Screwballs often satirized class standards in pursuit of some greater, personal virtue.That’s what made such knockabout directors diverse as Leo McCarey, George Cukor, Gregory La- Cava and Preston Sturges so elegant. Even Cavalier’s little-known French New Wave experimental chic used a romantic triangle format to explore political morality.

But Fletcher and Phillips do the opposite. In each film, the most shocking thing is not the disrespect for heterosexual marriage or the shameless indulgence of frat-boy toilet humor, but the filmmakers’ distance from the realities of family, home, work, love and place. The actors occupy a nowhereland of outrageous gags (Proposal casually mocks the working class and Hangover offers blithe misogyny.) Their farce structures don’t exercise or confirm real experience but follow the manipulations of TV comedy—only a laff track is missing from each. It’s an ordeal watching grown men stumbling through Vegas amidst a tiger, a baby, a stripper and assorted thugs—including a cameo by Mike Tyson that makes the humanistic inquiry of James Toback’s recent documentary seem for naught. It’s also dismal watching the key scene where Bullock and Reynolds ad lib the story of their proposal to a public gathering; as each improvisation is cut up into TV jigsaw puzzle pieces instead of a unified two-shot. It falls flat.

The Proposal and The Hangover are slippery-slope comedies celebrating irresponsible, unethical behavior for public enjoyment. Moviemaking this bad is only sustainable if all you care about is Hollywood capitalism. I know some people get more thrill out of the box-office totals than they do from a good comedy (and sometimes conflate box-office success with artistic mirth), but this reduction of romantic ethics has no justification other than money-making. Look at how Fletcher bungles Bullock and Reynolds’ bonding moment: They sing Rob Base and DJ Easy Rock’s “It Takes Two” in geometrical (emotional) opposition. And Bullock’s comic solo doing Lil Jon’s “Get Low” is clumsily staged. Although Fletcher’s career began as a choreographer, Bullock and Reynolds don’t dance at the end; they’re denied potential romantic epiphany like Schneider and Trintignant. Instead, Fletcher’s finale is a blooper reel imitating When Harry Met Sally and Mr. & Mrs. Smith—confirming she’s a hack like Todd Phillips.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 08/21/2009 
 
Though I don't always agree with you, Mr. White, on this one I couldn't agree more. I'm shocked 'The Hangover' has such a good rating at rottentomatoe. It's just unrealistic, soulless characters stumbling around for almost two hours. I didn't laugh once.

 

Posted at 08/14/2009 
 
It's so refreshing to read a critic who doesn't follow the pack, but is willing to tell it like it is. I just discovered you, Mr. White. I'll be coming back for more.

 

Posted at 08/12/2009 
 
Please stop reviewing movies! You suck. You are the Roland Emmerich (someone whose movies you probably love) of movie reviewers. You are terrible. You are the downright worst!!! Stop!!!! You suck!!!

 

Posted at 07/13/2009 
 
Dude, lighten up. This review is so typical of New Yorkers. People who do nothing but work, and whose idea of fun is going to the Hamptons to play croquet with their WASP friends. Come to CA, and you can see that the people featured in this movie, guys who like to have fun and hit Vegas up for a bachelor party (or any occasion) are a lot more entertaining to be around than your stuffy, Madison Avenue penthouse. THis film portrayed guys being guys. When we get together, we revert back to third graders. We drink heavily, do drugs, and have casual sex with easy women. And it's FUN! It's no surprise to me this is being panned in NYC. After all, those "ruffians aren't our type dear. Now let's go to Stamford to visit the Chesterfields."

 

Posted at 07/07/2009 
 
An elderly man's lumpy, celluloid-ridden body. Three men getting tasered in the head and balls... by children! Characters endlessly screaming "We're f***ed!" or, for a change of pace, "This is f***ed!" (usually uttered by smug, charmless Bradley Cooper). The standard-issue categorization of women as Bellicose Shrews or Angelic Strippers. A swishy Chinese villain shouting broken-Engrish insults. (Race-baiting and homophobic stereotyping in a single character -- neat trick!) For these and many other sub- 4th-grade delights, please see "The Hangover," directed by stunted hack Todd Phillips (also responsible for "Road Trip," "Starsky and Hutch" and "School for Scoundrels"). Even the laughs earned by the grandly original comic performance of Zach Galifianakis are curdled by the early admission of his character, Alan, that he "can't be within 200 yards of schools or Chuck E. Cheeses." Ick. Only one part of "The Hangover" succeeds brilliantly. And you'll have to wait about 100 minutes to see it. An end-credits photo montage, filling in the characters' temporal blanks, reveals the circumstances by which a tiger, a baby, a run-in with Wayne Newton, a missing tooth, and other roofie-feuled mysteries came to be. What is so deeply, honestly funny about these still-lifes is the disparity between the maniacal joy of the moment and the inevitable next-morning comedown. But more than that, photographs are the ultimate distillation of time, inviting the audience to quickly absorb and flesh out what is frozen before them. And, of course, rarely is the moving picture as funny as what's in our own heads. Particularly when that moving picture is "The Hangover." From my blog: www.cynicalmatt.blogspot.com

 

 
 
Close
Close