Click to Print
. . . . . . .
 
Oct
08

Harry Connick Jr. Hates Racism. Australia, Not So Much.

In Section: NY comPRESSed » Posted In: Theater, Opinion, Tourism Posted By: Mike Spence
-

Actor Harry Connick Jr. was on Australia’s version of The Gong Show when a group called Jackson Jive came on featuring five guys in blackface and one man in whiteface playing Michael Jackson. If reading those words didn’t make you disgusted, just watch the video, complete with a crowd of Aussies cheering along, and see where that gets you.

Dlisted has the clip, in which Connick doesn’t even try to hide his contempt for the group, giving them a 0 for their efforts. Harry even gave the audience a little chiding at the end of the show, not unlike an elementary school principle would give to a class of stupid 3rd graders. But, not unlike petulant children, the country as a whole didn’t seem to learn their lesson. The next day 80 per cent of

this Australian website’s readers voted that the skit wasn’t racist.

I’m not pretending to know anything about Australian/Aboriginal relations, in fact, the only thing I really know about Australia is that Knifey-Spoony is their national pastime. Bad taste, though, doesn’t know national character, and the best thing you can say about a blackface act is that 99.9% of the time it’s in poor taste. Maybe that kind of minstrel-show “humor” is still acceptable in certain parts of the world, but luckily in this case we all had Harry Connick Jr. there to set the record straight on this trash.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 10/11/2009 
 
The skit was a group of mostly NON WHITE persons impersonatoring a musical band by changing their skin colour (over done, yes) to look more like the original act is incidental to the impersonation’; it doesn’t make race the joke. The only possible ethnic commentary angle was that the person playing Michael Jackson – who is ethnically Indian – coloured his face white, a reference to the late entertainer’s fading skin colour. If there hadn’t been a Red Faces judge from the old slave-holding, black-lynching American south or if they had of changed their skin colour, worn dreadlocks and tea cosies on their heads and sung a reggae song, there would have been no ‘race’ controversy. Australia never developed blackface theater to perpetuate racist archetypes so we failed to realise that there is sensitivity to a near-paranoid state about white-black relationstthis and blackface. What we are quility of is cross-cultural misunderstanding, not racism by the performers or the audience that enjoyed the sketch.

 

Posted at 10/11/2009 
Non-white ? Let me dumb it down for you.. Racism is not dependant on race.. An "Indian" can make racial slurs against "whites".. an asian can be deogratory towards an african. Your assertion that it cannot be racist on the base of race is... well racist...

 

Posted at 10/11/2009 
Overdone? They had all the benefits of a modern television studio including make-up artists, so why was it so overdone? It was overdone because when you make fun of an african american in australia, it is acceptable to mimic the "minstrels" of blackface theatre. The only thing we agree on is that there is a lack of cultural sensitivity predominate in Australian society, nor does this society feel such sensitivity nessecary.

 

Posted at 10/10/2009 
 
Mark P neglects to say "Australians as a whole protested this murder, and refused to send troops" probably because the average Australian's response was apathic to say the least. I'm surprised he hasn't used the "slavery card", a tactic I see used on many blogs. Yes, every school kid in Australia and America is aware of slavery and the civil war in America, a deepfully shamefull thing that was addressed and not forgotten. It appears very few are aware of Australias shamefull slavery of the Kanakas, as no Australians fought to free their slaves, they simply discarded them when they could find no more use for the practise. Australia's use of slaves lies unaddressed and ignored and yet people such as Mark P accuse others of denial. I am personally glad of all this furore, it could have been solved with a simple "Gosh, we are embarrassed this happened", but Australians in their thousands are hitting the net, and ironically defending their racism with yet more racism and exposing their true national character. This is not to say that there are not Australians who understand the damage of racism in a increasingly globalized world. In fact a recent poll showed that 40% of Australians believe there is a racism problem in Australia. If we were to judge from Mark P's comments, eradicating the willfull ignorance of the other 60% will take time, but like slavery these are obselete ideas that will serve as a reminder of the depth of depravity humanity can attain in ignorance.

 

Posted at 10/09/2009 
 
I am an American who has lived in Australia since 1972. In my opinion racism is rife in Australia, and I feel well qualified to comment because I have experienced it first hand. In the town that I live in we have asian tourists who come to harvest fruit. The general consenus is that "they don't spend enough money in town" and "they shouldn't be allowed to drive". I have heard comments such as "they are filthy dogs" and "they are less than human". It is little wonder then, that a "Blackface" act is acceptable to the average Australian, I'm surprised that there were no references to cottonpicking. Perhaps this is due to cultural differences. After all Australia was a convict colony, and survived on a social structure that depended on a heirarchy, Govenors,Troops,Overseers,Trustees and finally convicts. As such the system relied on restriction of individual freedoms based on inequality. How can such a culture understand the American principles of liberty, equality and fraternity, and that these values sustained armed rebellion against elements within and without their own society, Americans prefering death to oppression.

 

Posted at 10/10/2009 
You're lying and in denial.

 

Posted at 10/09/2009 
 
Mike Spence, you are an idiot, and if anything, YOUR article sounds pretty racist, or not really racist but you are putting Australia down. For gods sake, they werent picking on the Jackson 5, they were doing a tribute. Whats so wrong about recognising a persons colour, its just because your country is still guilty about how awful and racist you were back then that you sook about any country that recognises anyone of colour. Yeah, why dont you go back to what your country does best, invading and bombing countries. I dont know why we are allies with you, I cant stand your country. Aussie Aussie Aussie!! Oi! Oi! Oi!

 

Posted at 10/09/2009 
 
As an Australian I cannot believe all the controversy created by a skit on a tv show. It was not intended to cause offence to anyone. Most Australians do not know the history of 'black face' as it is part of American culture and history. This is why 80% of the people surveyed in the newspaper poll did not find it racist or offensive. American tv portrays Australians negatively all the time, American actors trying to put on an Aussie accent and looking like Crocodiles Dundee or Steve Urwin going around saying “mate and crikey”. Although I cringe at such stereotypes because no one that I know goes around looking like that or talking like that, I do not get offended by it. Also the people who took part in the skit were all non-anglo including one dark skinned person of Indian background.

 

Posted at 10/09/2009 
It's no good trying to argue. This the same culture that endorses misogynistic black male actors dressing up and lampooning women as second rate. e.g. Big Fat Momma & The Klumps. Then theres the black actors who lampoon white females as "bufoons" in White Chicks. It's OK for Saturday Night Live to impersonate people, like Fred Armisen did with Obama.

 

 
 
Close
Close