Mugger: Bill of Wrongs
Barring the still-unlikely event that Hillary Clinton is elected president this Novemberwhich would entail not only corrupting the Democratic Partys very weird nomination process as well as mending fences with outraged African Americansthe most satisfying result for Republicans would be Bill Clintons exit from the national stage. If Barack Obama prevails, perhaps Clinton might land an ambassadorship to St. Lucia; if its John McCain, he can expect nothing.
Those of us who opposed Clinton during his contentious presidencythe gargantuan ego (even for a politician); the constant hypocrisy, best exemplified when he declared his kinship with Americans playing by the rules, even when his fundraisers engaged in dubious and maybe illegal methods; the initial lies about Monica Lewinsky, turning a tawdry but largely irrelevant bout of adultery into a crippling and prolonged scandal; and, upon leaving office, the pardon of jes folks fugitive Marc Richwill be delighted to see him go.
Better yet, a sizable percentage of his own supporters, who clamored for a third Clinton term in 2000, are disgusted by his conduct during this campaign: not only because of his outrageous and incorrect comparison of the Jesse Jackson and Obama candidacies in South Carolina but also his inability to let his wife take the spotlight this year. The noxious slogan from 92, Two for the price of one, which enchanted liberals and feminists who envisioned a First Lady who did more than choose the color of curtains and suggested menus for state dinners, has taken on a new and ugly significance.
Bill Clinton has, in a rapid and wholly unexpected twist of Democratic orthodoxy, become political baggage. The former chief executive, in keeping with his appalling me-myself-and-I character, wasnt shy, even at the height of his popularity while in office, in regretting that his legacy was diminished because he wasnt a wartime president. Now, after his self-serving performances across the country this year, hell be consigned, even by sympathetic historians, to the purgatory of a middle-tier presidency, maybe lumped together with Grover Cleveland instead of Harry Truman. Just the thought of this new realitywith his wife in office, the opportunity to burnish his record was tantalizinghas probably aged Clinton 10 years.
Vanity Fairs Michael Wolffwhod rather give up a book advance than vote Republicanclaims in a curious June column that adultery will comprise the bulk of Clintons legacy. He writes: The Clinton-Lewinsky dramaas documentary a look at sexuality as Kinseycreated a virtual racial stereotype of middle-aged [white male] desire, an Amos N Andy of sexual need. Wolffs unmistakable brief for Obama is explained by the conjecture that Americans want to elect a president who doesnt need to get some on the side. Against these middle-aged people, hes the naturalist, Wolff says, the credible and hopeful figure of a man who might actually be having sex with his smiling, energetic, and oomphy wife. Its hard to argue with Wolffs borderline salacious description of Michele Obama as oomphy, but its plain silly of him to describe the Senator as young. Obama is 46, and if thats not middle-agedin fact, Wolffs not that much olderwell, who knows, maybe people will reach 120 years sooner rather than later.
Anyway, lets also not forget that the goofy appellation given to Bill Clinton by Toni Morrison as Americas first black president, now seems like a bit on a late-night comedy show. (He was also called, by awestruck admirers, the first woman, gay and Hispanic president, but those labels were deemed silly even the 1990s.) Its worth citing a passage (thanks to The Wall Street Journals James Taranto for digging up the piece) from Morrisons 1998 New Yorker essay: Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black president. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our childrens lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing [this is unique to blacks?], McDonalds-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas.
Now, just 10 years later, a mere decade, theres the very real possibility that Obama, who doesnt have white skin, will become president. For Clinton, paraphrasing the Grateful Dead, what a short, strange trip its been. The former president takes particular umbrage at Obamas repeated stump speeches in which he doesnt pay due deference in differentiating the administrations of Clinton and his widely reviled successor. The gall! In the May 5 New Yorker, Ryan Lizza, in a I can see both sides of the story and ultimately tepid essay about the burst Bill Clinton bubble, bent the ear of an anonymous Hillary adviser, who told him, I think this campaign has enraged [Bill] He doesnt like Obama. I guess not, considering that the frontrunner repeatedly says that Clinton, as well as Bush, is responsible for the loss of heartland jobs and the supposed Wall Street culture that envelops Washington.
In truth, I think two of Clintons most laudable accomplishments were his Welfare Reform Act (regardless of the political expediency that motivated him, cutting off Bob Doles legs in the 96 campaign) and his successful and bitter effort to pass the NAFTA legislation. That Obama strikes a protectionist posewhich would naturally lead to an unwise nativist stance on immigration, even if he wont admit itis one reason, among many, that I prefer John McCain; but just imagine how seriously this pisses off Bill Clinton.
Still, what possessed the man once called The Natural, for his legendary campaigning skills, to call South Carolinas Rep. James Clyburn in the middle of the night (according to Lizzas mole) and rant at him for nearly an hour? Clyburn, who is black and influential, said later: Its pretty widespread now that African-Americans have lost a whole lot of respect for Bill Clinton.
But far more damaging for the multimillionaire, jet-setting Clinton is that his constituency in the mainstream media has also lost respect for him. Apologists like historian/essayist David Greenberg and the cartoonish James Carville notwithstanding, that spells defeat for the egocentric Arkansan who once dreamed of a posterity that mentioned his name in the same sentences as John F. Kennedy.